Baird referred to the EU’s publicly stated objectives to develop the South African industry and ‘not create havoc’ in this market. “The EU is all too aware of the threat that dumping creates and robustly defends its interest as in the recent case of the steel industry,” the letter reads, referring to the EU’s recent move to impose anti-dumping measures on steel products from China and Taiwan. “You would expect us in South Africa to do no less, I’m sure.”
The EU has denied claims that it is dumping chicken in South Africa and has blamed the crisis on ‘structural inefficiencies’ in the industry, among other things.
EU production costs dropped over three years
Baird quoted statistics compiled from data by SARS and LEI, the research institute at the University of Wageningen in The Netherlands, that showed that in 2013, the EU production costs for cut-up chicken portions was R25/kg, while in 2016, three years later, it was exporting to South Africa at R15/kg.
Fair Play also challenges EU claims that the South African industry is not competitive. “Are the subsidies of some €60 billion for EU farmers taken into account when you consider competitiveness and how much of this huge fund is made available to poultry farmers?” South African poultry farmers get no government subsidies.
As a transitional economy, it is vital for South Africa’s indigenous industries to have every opportunity to develop and compete in a fair and open market.
Baird argues, “EU chicken, by any definition, is being dumped here, is causing material damage to a key agricultural industry and is illegal.”
Perhaps the ambassador is unaware, he says, that in South Africa, as opposed to Europe, the average worker supports as many as 10 dependents and that 1.3 million people are thus threatened with poverty; this in a country with one of the highest levels of unemployment in the world.