POLITICAL NEWS - Barely a month into 2020, retrenchments, the trimming of workforces and restructuring talks are dominating the news.
In recent years, the mining industry has been the one undertaking such actions, but last week’s announcements came from companies in the telecoms and retail sectors.
Telkom announced plans to cut 3 000 jobs, Sibanye-Stillwater revealed that it has given voluntary packages to 1 142 employees as part of its restructuring process, and Massmart said that it may close 34 stores, which will affect at least 1 400 employees. That is a possible 6 000 jobs gone, just two weeks into 2020.
Winners and losers
Consequentially, the impact of limited growth and economic stagnation is disproportionate to employers and employees, and has created winners and losers. Companies in sectors such as mining, manufacturing and agriculture have responded to these changes by streamlining their operations, adopting technology and trying to find a way to reduce their exposure to organised labour risk.
This means government finds itself between a rock and hard place.
On the one hand, public spending that is out of hand mostly due to the debt of SOEs means using fiscal policy to try and jumpstart growth has not worked. In fact, it has pushed South Africa further down the debt hole.
On the other hand, government, including the SOEs, cannot afford to keep its perpetually increasing workforce – it doesn’t have the money. If the late payments to employees by various municipalities is anything to go by, it seems government simply won’t be able to sustain the rising wage bill.
Compounding the problem
Why is being between the rock and hard place a problem? The key concern is that, like companies responding to the changes in the world market, governments have to respond in such a way that they can keep up. However, two factors stand out.
First – being riddled with debt that is increasing, with a large workforce and SOEs that are floundering and in debt is not a sustainable way to run a government.
Second, and related, is that sooner or later government may find itself unable to service its debt and in need of loans from the International Monetary Fund (IMF).
IMF loans come with strict conditionalities that may prove more costly than if government undertook a self-imposed process of restructuring and reform.
The bottom line is that South Africa being in this mess is of its own doing.
Yes, there have been external factors beyond its control, but the severe joblessness and other social problems that have emerged from it is our own doing. In previous articles I have demonstrated how it has always been strong the hand of politics over economic reality that has led to this very moment.
Given that 2020 has started as the year of the culling of jobs, it is likely that the current 29.1% unemployment rate will break into the 30s.
Considering the projected growth and the often-cited regulatory constraints, the year will continue to see a retreat in investment and very little job creation.
This prolonged economic stagnation that has increased unemployment and failed to reabsorb the unemployed (including graduates) is strengthening the case for structural reform.
Read: Traditional labour policies are hurting SA
If Finance Minister Tito Mboweni’s tweets and his last Medium-Term Budget Policy Statement are any indication, a tougher stance by Treasury is likely as he continues to seek structural reform.
To start with, we may see fiscal consolidation that will include the restructuring of SOEs, reducing their bulkiness and transforming them into leaner companies that can self-sustain. Secondly, government will need a revised labour policy that has considered how technological changes in the global economy have changed the labour market.
Will Mboweni find support from his party and government? That remains to be seen.
What I do know is that sooner rather than later, unless there is a convergence of labour market, economic and even fiscal policies, South Africa’s key problems will persist – including the relentless retrenchments.
